
Infrastructure3 min read



Policy3 min read
FSI incentives and zone-specific rules have turned regulation into a redevelopment engine.

Mumbai's redevelopment surge is not a spontaneous market outcome. It comes from a purpose-built policy ecosystem shaped to tackle the city's twin problems of land scarcity and ageing housing stock. Over the last decade, regulation has moved from fragmented controls to an integrated framework built around FSI incentives, financial instruments and zone-specific levers.
The Development Control and Promotion Regulations (DCPR) 2034 replaced DCR 1991 and fundamentally redefined how land, density and incentives work in Mumbai. Its key enablers include incentive FSI for projects with tenant rehousing obligations or public benefit, and higher buildability for cluster and composite redevelopment through amalgamation bonuses and relaxed design norms.
Cessed buildings under 33(7): covers cessed (pre-1969) buildings in the Island City, with FSI linked to Table 30(A) and a 50% incentive over the rehab requirement.
Cluster redevelopment under 33(9): designed for larger land tracts, typically over 4,000–6,000 sq m, allowing up to 4.0 FSI or higher in special incentive zones.
Independent societies under 33(7B): enables redevelopment of standalone societies, especially relevant in the suburbs, with FSI adjusted for road width and plot conditions.
MHADA buildings under 33(5): applies to MHADA layouts, often with low-income or rental housing, allowing up to 4.0 FSI plus further incentives depending on tenant count and amenities.
Incentive FSI for tenant rehousing or public benefit
Cluster schemes get amalgamation bonuses and relaxed norms
33(9) cluster redevelopment allows up to 4.0 FSI or more
33(7B) opens redevelopment to standalone societies
For general information only. Verify details with official sources before making decisions.

Infrastructure3 min read

Market1 min read
Buyer guide3 min read